GitHub Copilot Jacks Up Prices: Developers Lose It
·2 min read·Beginner
“
Microsoft just switched to token-based billing—basically, every line of code your AI buddy writes now costs you real money. The community is not thrilled. Goodbye to the golden age of nearly-free AI coding.
In 30 seconds
01Microsoft shifts Copilot from free to token-based pricing, charging per line of code.
02
→
💡
What this means for you
If you use Copilot, you're now paying for every line it writes. If you're a developer not working at a megacorp, your profit margin just got smaller.
Smart search engine Perplexity AI needs serious muscle to grow. They just found it in Crusoe, who'll rent them a whole lot of computing power for years.
·2 min·2·Beginner
Developers protest: new model could cost more than a junior developer's salary.
03End of free-software-for-hype era, Microsoft needs to monetize its investments.
For years, GitHub Copilot was tech's biggest gift: an AI that read your code, figured out what you were trying to do, and finished your lines for you. Sometimes it nailed it, sometimes it produced absolute nonsense, but it was free (or close enough). Now Microsoft has decided to actually make money off it.
The new billing model? Tokens. Think of it like paying not for the service itself, but for every single word the AI spits out. Ask Copilot to write a complex function? That'll be cash. Developers are calling it like switching from a gym with a monthly membership to one where you pay per pushup.
The backlash was instant and brutal. Twitter, GitHub, forums—suddenly filled with developers throwing around words like "scam," "unjustified," and honestly, worse. Some did the math and found that keeping Copilot active could cost more than a junior developer's salary. Nobody's sure if those numbers are right, but the mood is definitely tense.
📬 Enjoying this article?
Get the best AI news every week, straight to your inbox.
The real issue is both psychological and practical. When something's free (or cheap), you use it without thinking twice. No mental friction, no "I better not mess this up because it costs." But slap a direct price tag on what you produce? The entire mental contract shifts. Now developers are wondering: "Why pay for Copilot when I can hit Stack Overflow or grab an open-source tool?"
Microsoft probably has their numbers. Maybe it works great for the big enterprises running Copilot at industrial scale. But for freelancers, beginners, and anyone not at Google or Meta, this shift from "free" to "pay-per-use" is not the move they were hoping for. And here's the real question people are asking: is it actually worth paying for an AI that sometimes writes code that doesn't even run?
What's really happening here is the end of the "free tech for hype" era. Microsoft, like all big tech, has to monetize its bets. But in doing so, it nuked Copilot's main selling point: that feeling of having a superpower built into your editor at zero cost. Now it's just another subscription on your already-infinite subscription bill.
Picture an AI that doesn't just reply, but actually thinks like a seasoned sales pro. Salesforce Koa is here, and it’s set to make some big AI labs very uncomfortable.
Imagine boarding your train for work, only to find the tracks are a mess. In the Netherlands, it's not just a technical glitch, but something far more sinister.
NUOVO
