OpenAI: Altman confirms “models changed” after US government talks
·2 min read·Beginner
“
Who'd have thought governments would poke their nose in? OpenAI apparently tweaked its models before public release.
In 30 seconds
01Sam Altman revealed OpenAI's AI models underwent changes.
02Modifications followed discussions with the Trump administration.
→
💡
What this means for you
For us regular folks, it means someone's trying to rein in the AI giants, even if we don't know the exact changes. The AI we use has already gone through a governmental "quality check."
Thought slapping 'AI' next to a company name guaranteed its stock would soar? Well, the market had a bitter surprise this year.
·1 min·2·Beginner
03The goal was safety before public release of the models.
0101
What exactly did OpenAI's boss say?
Sam Altman, the man at OpenAI's helm, candidly admitted his company tweaked its artificial intelligence models. He stated that OpenAI modified its artificial intelligence models. This happened after quite a few chats with the Trump administration, before the famous models were sent out to the public. In short, a significant "suggestion."
It's not every day that a tech company admits to changing its product at a government's behest. Usually, they just hit the accelerator. Altman spoke of "many changes" that preceded the public launch of their latest AI jewels. It seems safety was the keyword in these negotiations.
0202
Why is the government poking its nose in?
Governments, it seems, care about our safety, especially when it comes to artificial intelligence. Discussions were held with the Trump administration before the public release of the newest models. The risk of an out-of-control AI causing harm, or perhaps saying things they don't like, is always lurking around.
📬 Enjoying this article?
Get the best AI news every week, straight to your inbox.
So, before giving the green light, the executive branch wanted to ensure OpenAI wasn't releasing some sort of miniature Skynet. There's talk of concerns related to misinformation, ethics, and who knows what other apocalyptic scenarios only Washington can imagine. It's a bit like pulling the handbrake before a steep descent, but with AI.
0303
And for us regular folks, what changes?
For those who use AI daily, perhaps to write emails or generate images, these modifications might mean little to nothing. OpenAI made "many changes" to the models following these discussions. In fact, the AI we use has already been vetted by some bureaucrat, which should help us sleep better, or maybe not?
We don't know exactly what these changes were, nor if they made the AI "nicer" or just less "inconvenient." The idea is that, before reaching us, these models were somewhat domesticated. After all, we wouldn't want an AI suggesting we do strange things, would we? Or maybe that's the whole fun of it.
While the tech world was buzzing about OpenAI, Anthropic made its move. They just dropped Opus 5, a model they claim is almost as good as their legendary Fable 5.